4th Sunday of Advent – Year A – December 22, 2019
Is 7,10-14; Ps 24; Rom 1: 1-7; Mt 1.18-24
6th Sunday of Advent – Sunday of the Incarnation or of the Divine Motherhood of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Is 62,10-63,3b; Ps 71; Phil 4: 4-9; Lk 1,26-38a
1) Accepting Christ as St. Joseph did.
Only two days separate this fourth Sunday of Advent from Christmas. The day after tomorrow we will gather to celebrate the great mystery of infinite love that never ceases to amaze us: God became the Son of man so that we may become children of God.
To help us welcome the Messiah, today’s Liturgy offers the example of St. Joseph. Like him, we must welcome the God made man who comes to us as a gift made in Mary, the Virgin Mother. Like Joseph, we must “simply” welcome him.
Telling us about the events that preceded the birth of Jesus, today’s Gospel helps us to learn this “how”, put in place by Joseph to welcome the gift of God, and live it as a vocation and not as a problem.
In his narration, the evangelist Matthew does not explain the thoughts of St. Joseph but tells us the essentials about the Custodian of the Redeemer. This Saint of Silence (the Gospels do not record any of his words and, in front of the amazing fact of Mary’s motherhood, he does not accuse his wife of infidelity. He is silent because he believes in her innocent purity) tries to do God’s will and is ready to give up taking into his home his legitimate wife who had fascinated his mind and his heart. In fact, instead of asserting his groom’s rights, Giuseppe chooses a solution that represents an enormous sacrifice for him, “Because he was a just man and did not want to accuse her publicly, he thought of repudiating her in secret” (Mt. 1:19).
If we think of the love that Joseph had for Mary, this short sentence summarizes a real inner drama. But, even in such a circumstance Joseph intends to do the will of God and decides, surely with great sorrow, to secretly send Mary away. This verse must be meditated with profound attention in order to understand what was the test that Joseph had to sustain in the days that preceded the birth of Jesus. A test like that of the sacrifice of Abraham when God asked for his son Isaac (see Gen. 22): to give up the most precious thing, the most loved person.
However, as in the case of Abraham, the Lord intervenes: He found the faith He was seeking, now He opens a different way, a way of love and happiness: “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary your wife into your home. For it is through the Holy Spirit that this child has been conceived in her. “(Mt 1.20).
The Gospel passage of this Sunday shows us the greatness of Saint Joseph’s soul. He was following a good life plan, but God reserved another design for him, a bigger mission. Joseph was a man who always listened to the voice of God, profoundly sensitive to his secret will, a man who was attentive to the messages that came to him from the bottom of his heart and from above. He did not persist in pursuing his life project; he did not allow resentment to poison his soul, but he was ready to make himself available for the novelty that, in a disconcerting way, was presented to him. He was a good man. He did not hate and did not allow grudge to poison his soul. How often hatred, dislike, and rancor poison our soul! And it hurts.
Do not allow that to happen. He is an example of this. In doing so, Joseph became freer and greater. Accepting himself according to the design of the Lord, Joseph fully finds himself beyond himself. This freedom of renouncing to what is his and to the possession of his own existence and his interior availability to the will of God challenge us and show us the way. If like Saint Joseph we welcome Christ, the living gospel, we will know that the Gospel does not destroy anything. The Gospel does not leave out any reality, consecrates everything, reveals everything, does everything, and gives to life an infinite, wonderful and happy dimension.
On this Sunday let’s prepare ourselves to welcome the baby Jesus as Saint Joseph did. The prize he received was the love of Mary and Jesus, becoming his putative father (it would be better to say: legal) and the vicar of the heavenly Father on earth.
Let us keep Mary and Joseph together. With a single glance, we contemplate the Virgin Mother, the woman full of grace who had the courage to entrust herself totally to the Word of God, and Joseph, the faithful and just man who preferred to believe in the Lord instead of listening to the voices of doubt and human pride. With them, let’s walk together towards the crib, with them let’s build the crib where to lay down Christ, Gift of God, Truth that saves our lives.
2) The Angel brought the announcement to Joseph.
This Sunday’s Gospel tells us about the announcement to Joseph, the legal father of Jesus, who was born because this craftsman from Nazareth said yes and gave a secure abode where the Word of incarnate Love could be the Emmanuel. There is a close relationship between the Announcement to Mary and the one to Joseph. Appearing in a dream to this just man, the Angel introduces him into the mystery of Mary’s virginal motherhood: this young woman, who according to the law is his “bride”, became a mother by virtue of the Holy Spirit remaining virgin.
The Angel turns to Joseph as the “bridegroom of Mary”, the one who in time will have to impose the name of “Jesus” on the Son who will be born from the Virgin of Nazareth married to him. He, therefore, turns to Joseph, entrusting him with the tasks to be the earthly father of the Son of Mary: “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary your wife, because what is generated in her comes from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you will call him Jesus; he will in fact save his people from their sins “(Mt 1: 20-21).
The response of the holy Carpenter of Nazareth to the Angel was not given with words, but with factual obedience: “Joseph did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took his bride with him” (Mt 1.24). He had loving care of Mary and dedicated himself with joyful commitment to the education of Jesus Christ (see S. Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, IV, 23, 1: S. Ch. 100/2, 692-694). It does not appear that Jesus attended any school, but along with Mary he had three masters greater than schoolteachers: Joseph the worker, Nature, and Sacred Scripture.
It should not be forgotten that Jesus was a worker and the legal son of a worker. It should not be forgotten that Jesus was born poor and lived among people who earned their bread with the work of their hands. Hands that blessed the children and the poor, welcomed the sinners and healed the sick. Hands that before being bathed in his blood spilled for us, were wet with sweat and that felt the soreness of fatigue. Hands that knew how much strength it takes to drive nails. Hands that “are the landscape of the Heart” (Saint John Paul II).
We must not forget Nature, which teaches us about God by showing its splendor. If we study the book of Nature, we perceive in it the imprint of God, our prayer becomes contemplation of the Creator and we say: “Blessed are you, Lord, in the firmament, worthy of praise and glory over the centuries” (Dn 3, 56). With this prayer, the Christian expresses his gratitude not only for the gift of creation but also because he perceives himself as a recipient of the fatherly concern of God who, in Christ, raised him to the dignity of son. A paternal concern that makes us look at the creation with new eyes and taste its beauty in which we perceive, as in filigree, the love of God.
We should not forget the Sacred Scripture, which for Jesus were obvious nourishment so that He answered to the devil who tempted him: “Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God“. The Word of God is intertwined with the Eucharist, as Origen writes: “We read the Holy Scriptures. I think the Gospel is the Body of Christ; I think the Holy Scriptures are his teaching. And when he says: “Whoever does not eat my flesh and drink my blood” (Jn 6:53), although these words should be understood also of the Eucharistic Mystery, yet the body of Christ and the blood of Christ are truly the word of the Holy Scriptures; it is the teaching of God. When we go to the Eucharistic Mystery, if a crumb falls, we feel lost. And if, while listening to the Word of God and the Word of God and the flesh of Christ and his blood are poured into our ears, we think of something else, we run great danger. “
3) The Emmanuel is a miracle of obedience.
Faced with the prodigy of the virginal conception, St. Matthew highlights the words of Isaiah’s prophecy and the obedience of Joseph, a just man. The text of Isaiah 7.14 in its original context referred to the birth of the son of King Ahaz, a sign that his house would have a future.
The evangelist uses it to indicate first the virginity of Mary. Secondly, the text provides the name Emmanuel, God with us, that reaffirms the identity of the Son of God and introduces the idea of the constant presence of Jesus among his own and that will be explained by the Risen One at the time of his ascension to heaven ( see Mt 28.20). The apostle Paul will later say: “If God is with us, who will be against us?” (Rom 8:32).
Thanks to the obedience of faith of Joseph and Mary and thanks to their acceptance of the word that God addressed to them through His Angel, they welcomed the Emmanuel, the God with us, into their home.
Joseph like Mary opened himself to the gift of God so that God could give birth to the promised salvation. Joseph took with him Mary, his bride, and with her the mission of giving flesh to the Word of God. The Gospel passage ends with v. 25 where St. Matthew states ” He had no relations with her until she bore a son, and he named him Jesus. “. In Joseph, we have the example of the man of faith who listens and puts into practice the Word of God (see Mt 7:24) and who, welcoming it, becomes part of the divine family, as John assures us: ” But to those who did accept him he gave power to become children of God “ (Jn 1:12).
Following the example of Mary, the Consecrated Virgins accept the Word of God, obeying with virginal love. In a world, at least the Christian one, in which chastity is admired even if not always understood, in a world where obedience is despised, these women are called to show that obedience is to say yes to God as Joseph and Mary did. Theirs is a spousal obedience and a gesture of freedom. Obedience is adequate to the love of Christ, who does not give us anything, but himself as the Bridegroom of the Church.
Obedience is convenient to Love because it is sharing of the indivisible, participation created to the perfection of God, excess of God in the measures of man. The obedient vocation of the Consecrated Virgins is the readiness to accept the action of God, who is loved above all things and persons.
Obedience is the response of the consecrated person who, in prayerful contact with the incarnate Word, discovers God’s will for his life, ratifies it and experiences that “in his will is our peace” (Dante Alighieri).
Saint John Chrysostom
Homily on Matthew
Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the Prophet, saying, Behold, a Virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a Son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel.”
I Hear many say, “While we are here, and enjoying the privilege of hearing, we are awed, but when we are gone out, we become altered men again, and the flame of zeal is quenched.” What then may be done, that this may not come to pass? Let us observe whence it arises. Whence then doth so great a change in us arise? From the unbecoming employment of our time, and from the company of evil men. For we ought not as soon as we retire from the Communion, to plunge into business unsuited to the Communion, but as soon as ever we get home, to take our Bible into our hands, and call our wife and children to join us in putting together what we have heard, and then, not before, engage in the business of life.
For if after the bath you would not choose to hurry into the market place, lest by the business in the market you should destroy the refreshment thence derived; much more ought we to act on this principle after the Communion. But as it is, we do the contrary, and in this very way throw away all. For while the profitable effect of what hath been said to us is not yet well fixed, the great force of the things that press upon us from without sweeps all entirely away.
That this then may not be the case, when you retire from the Communion, you must account nothing more necessary than that you should put together the things that have been said to you. Yes, for it were the utmost folly for us, while we give up five and even six days to the business of this life, not to bestow on things spiritual so much as one day, or rather not so much as a small part of one day. See ye not our own children, that whatever lessons are given them, those they study throughout the whole day? This then let us do likewise, since otherwise we shall derive no profit from coming here, drawing water daily into a vessel with holes, and not bestowing on the retaining of what we have heard even so much earnestness as we plainly show with respect to gold and silver. For any one who has received a few pence both puts them into a bag and sets a seal thereon; but we, having given us oracles more precious than either gold or costly stones, and receiving the treasures of the Spirit, do not put them away in the storehouses of our soul, but thoughtlessly and at random suffer them to escape from our minds. Who then will pity us after all this, plotting against our own interests, and casting ourselves into so deep poverty? Therefore, that this may not be so, let us write it down an unalterable law for ourselves, for our wives, and for our children, to give up this one day of the week entire to hearing, and to the recollection of the things we have heard. For thus with greater aptness for learning shall we approach what is next to be said; and to us the labor will be less, and to you the profit greater, when, bearing in memory what hath been lately spoken, ye hearken accordingly to what comes afterwards. For no little doth this also contribute towards the understanding of what is said, when ye know accurately the connexion of the thoughts, which we are busy in weaving together for you. For since it is not possible to set down all in one day, you must by continued remembrance make the things laid before you on many days into a kind of chain, and so wrap it about your soul: that the body of the Scriptures may appear entire.
Therefore let us not either to-day go on to the subjects set before us, without first recalling what was lately said to our memory.
2. But what are the things set before us to-day? “Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying.” In a tone worthy of the wonder, with all his might he hath uttered his voice, saying, “Now all this was done.” For when he saw the sea and the abyss of the love of God towards man, and that actually come to pass which never had been looked for, and nature’s laws broken, and reconciliations made, Him who is above all come down to him that is lower than all, and “the middle walls of partition broken,” and the impediments removed, and many more things than these done besides; in one word he hath put before us the miracle, saying, “Now all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord.” For, “think not,” saith he, “that these things are now determined upon; they were prefigured of old.” Which same thing, Paul also everywhere labors to prove.
And the angel proceeds to refer Joseph to Isaiah; in order that even if he should, when awakened, forget his own words, as newly spoken, he might by being reminded of those of the prophet, with which he had been nourished up continually, retain likewise the substance of what he had said. And to the woman he mentioned none of these things, as being a damsel and unskilled in them, but to the husband, as being a righteous man and one who studied the prophets, from them he reasons. And before this he saith “Mary, thy wife;” but now, when he hath brought the prophet before him, he then trusts him with the name of virginity; for Joseph would not have continued thus unshaken, when he heard from him of a virgin, unless he had first heard it also from Isaiah. For indeed it was nothing novel that he was to hear out of the prophets, but what was familiar to him, and had been for a long time the subject of his meditations. For this cause the angel, to make what he said easy to be received, brings in Isaiah. And neither here doth he stop, but connects the discourse with God. For he doth not call the saying Isaiah’s, but that of the God of all things. For this cause he said not, “that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of Isaiah,” but “which was spoken of the Lord.” For the mouth indeed was Isaiah’s, but the oracle was wafted from above.
3. What then saith this oracle? “Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel.”
How was it then, one may say, that His name was not called Emmanuel, but Jesus Christ? Because he said not, “thou shalt call,” but “they shall call,” that is, the multitude, and the issue of events. For here he puts the event as a name: and this is customary in Scripture, to substitute the events that take place for names.
Therefore, to say, “they shall call” Him “Emmanuel,” means nothing else than that they shall see God amongst men. For He hath indeed always been amongst men, but never so manifestly.
But if Jews are obstinate, we will ask them. when was the child called, “Make speed to the spoil, hasten the prey?” Why, they could not say. How is it then that the prophet said, “Call his name Maher-shalal-hash-baz?” Because, when he was born, there was a taking and dividing of spoils, therefore the event that took place in his time is put as his name. And the city, too, it is said, shall be called “the city of righteousness, the faithful city Sion.” And yet we nowhere find that the city was called “righteousness,” but it continued to be called Jerusalem. However, inasmuch as this came to pass in fact, when the city underwent a change for the better, on that account he saith it is so called. For when any event happens which marks out him who brings it to pass, or who is benefited by it, more clearly than his name, the Scripture speaks of the truth of the event as being a name to him.
4. But if, when their mouths are stopped on this point, they should seek another, namely, what is said touching Mary’s virginity, and should object to us other translators, saying, that they used not the term “virgin,” but “young woman;” in the first place we will say this, that the Seventy were justly entitled to confidence above all the others. For these made their translation after Christ’s coming, continuing to be Jews, and may justly be suspected as having spoken rather in enmity, and as darkening the prophecies on purpose; but the Seventy, as having entered upon this work an hundred years or more before the coming of Christ, stand clear from all such suspicion, and on account of the date, and of their number, and of their agreement,1 would have a better right to be trusted.
But even if they bring in the testimony of those others, yet so the tokens of victory would be with us. Because the Scripture is wont to put the word “youth,” for “virginity;” and this with respect not to women only, but also to men. For it is said, “young men and maidens, old men with younger ones.”2 And again, speaking of the damsel who is attacked, it saith, “if the young woman cry out,”3 meaning the virgin.
And what goes before also establishes this interpretation. For he doth not merely say, “Behold, the Virgin shall be with child,” but having first said, “Behold, the Lord Himself shall give you a sign,” then he subjoins, “Behold, the Virgin shall be with child.”4 Whereas, if she that was to give birth was not a virgin, but this happened in the way of marriage, what sort of sign would the event be? For that which is a sign must of course be beyond the course of common events, it must be strange and extraordinary; else how could it be a sign?
5. “Then Joseph, being raised from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him.” Seest thou obedience, and a submissive mind? Seest thou a soul truly wakened, and in all things incorruptible? For neither when he suspected something painful or amiss could he endure to keep the Virgin with him; nor yet, after he was freed from this suspicion, could he bear to cast her out, but he rather keeps her with him, and ministers to the whole Dispensation.
“And took unto him Mary his wife.” Seest thou how continually the evangelist uses this word, not willing that that mystery should be disclosed as yet, and annihilating that evil suspicion?
And when he had taken her, “he knew her not, till she had brought forth her first-born Son.”5 He hath here used the word “till,” not that thou shouldest suspect that afterwards he did know her, but to inform thee that before the birth the Virgin was wholly untouched by man. But why then, it may be said, hath he used the word, “till”? Because it is usual in Scripture often to do this, and to use this expression without reference to limited times. For so with respect to the ark likewise, it is said, “The raven returned not till the earth was dried up.”6 And yet it did not return even after that time. And when discoursing also of God, the Scripture saith, “From age until age Thou art,”7 not as fixing limits in this case. And again when it is preaching the Gospel beforehand, and saying, “In his days shall righteousness flourish, and abundance of peace, till the moon be taken away,”8 it doth not set a limit to this fair part of creation. So then here likewise, it uses the word “till,” to make certain what was before the birth, but as to what follows, it leaves thee to make the inference. Thus, what it was necessary for thee to learn of Him, this He Himself hath said; that the Virgin was untouched by man until the birth; but that which both was seen to be a consequence of the former statement, and was acknowledged, this in its turn he leaves for thee to perceive; namely, that not even after this, she having so become a mother, and having been counted worthy of a new sort of travail, and a child-bearing so strange, could that righteous man ever have endured to know her. For if he had known her, and had kept her in the place of a wife, how is it that our Lord9 commits her, as unprotected, and having no one, to His disciple, and commands him to take her to his own home?
How then, one may say, are James and the others called His brethren? In the same kind of way as Joseph himself was supposed to be husband of Mary. For many were the veils provided, that the birth, being such as it was, might be for a time screened. Wherefore even John so called them, saying, “For neither did His brethren believe in Him.”10
6. Nevertheless they, who did not believe at first, became afterwards admirable, and illustrious. At least when Paul and they that were of his company were come up to Jerusalem about decrees11 they went in straightway unto James. For he was so admired as even to be the first to be entrusted with the bishop’s office. And they say he gave himself up to such great austerity, that even his members became all of them as dead, and that from his continual praying, and his perpetual intercourse with the ground, his forehead became so callous as to be in no better state than a camel’s knees, simply by reason of his striking it so against the earth.12 This man gives directions to Paul himself, when he was after this come up again to Jerusalem, saying,13 “Thou seest, brother, how many thousands there are of them that are come together.” So great was his understanding and his zeal, or rather so great the power of Christ. For they that mock Him when living, after His death are so filled with awe, as even to die for Him with exceeding readiness. Such things most of all show the power of His resurrection. For this, you see, was the reason of the more glorious things being kept till afterwards, viz. that this proof might become indisputable. For seeing that even those who are admired amongst us in their life, when they are gone, are apt to be forgotten by us; how was it that they, who made light of this Man living, afterwards thought Him to be God, if He was but one of the many? How was it that they consented even to be slain for His sake, unless they received His resurrection on clear proof?
7. And these things we tell you, that ye may not hear only, but imitate also his manly severity,14 his plainness of speech, his righteousness in all things; that no one may despair of himself, though hitherto he have been careless, that he may set his hopes on nothing else, after God’s mercy, but on his own virtue. For if these were nothing the better for such a kindred, though they were of the same house and lineage with Christ, until they gave proof of virtue; what favor can we possibly receive, when we plead righteous kinsmen and brethren, unless we be exceeding dutiful,15 and have lived in virtue? As the prophet too said, intimating the selfsame thing, “A brother redeemeth not, shall a man redeem?”16 No, not although it were17 Moses, Samuel, Jeremiah. Hear, for example, what God saith unto this last, “Pray not thou for this people, for I will not hear thee.”18 And why marvellest thou if I hear not thee? “Though Moses himself and Samuel stood before me,”19 I would not receive their supplication for these men.” Yea, if it be Ezekiel who entreats, he will be told, “Though Noah stand forth, and Job, and Daniel, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters.”20 Though the patriarch Abraham be supplicating for them that are most incurably diseased, and change not, God will leave him and go His way,21 that he may not receive his cry in their behalf. Though again it be Samuel who is doing this, He saith unto him, “Mourn not thou for Saul.”22 Though for his own sister one entreat, when it is not fitting, he again shall have the same sort of answer as Moses, “If her father had but spit in her face.”23
Let us not then be looking open-mouthed towards others. For it is true, the prayers of the saints have the greatest power; on condition however of our repentance and amendment. Since even Moses, who had rescued his own brother and six hundred thousand men from the wrath that was then coming upon them from God, had no power to deliver his sister;24 and yet the sin was not equal; for whereas she had done despite but to Moses, in that other case it was plain impiety, what they ventured on. But this difficulty I leave for you; while that which is yet harder, I will try to explain.
For why should we speak of his sister? since he who stood forth the advocate of so great a people had not power to prevail for himself, but after his countless toils, and sufferings, and his assiduity for forty years, was prohibited from setting foot on that land, touching which there had been so many declarations and promises. What then was the cause? To grant this favor would not be profitable, but would, on the contrary, bring with it much harm, and would be sure to prove a stumbling-block to many of the Jews. For if when they were merely delivered from Egypt, they forsook God, and sought after Moses, and imputed all to him; had they seen him also lead them into the land of promise, to what extent of impiety might they not have been cast away? And for this reason also, let me add, neither was his tomb made known.
And Samuel again was not able to save Saul from the wrath from above, yet he oftentimes preserved the Israelites. And Jeremiah prevailed not for the Jews, but some one else he did haply cover from evil by his prophecy.25 And Daniel saved the barbarians from slaughter,26 but he did not deliver the Jews from their captivity.
And in the Gospels too we shall see both these events come to pass, not in the case of different persons, but of the same; and the same man now prevailing for himself and now given up. For he who owed the ten thousand talents, though he had delivered himself from the danger by entreaty, yet again he prevailed not,27 and another on the contrary, who had before thrown himself away, afterwards had power to help himself in the greatest degree.28 But who is this? He that devoured his Father’s substance.
So that on the one hand, if we be careless, we shall not be able to obtain salvation, no not even by the help of others; if, on the other hand, we be watchful, we shall be able to do this by ourselves, and by ourselves rather than by others. Yes; for God is more willing to give His grace to us, than to others for us; that we by endeavoring ourselves to do away His wrath, may both enjoy confidence towards Him, and become better men. Thus He had pity on the Canaanitish woman, thus He saved the harlot, thus the thief, when there was none to be mediator nor advocate.
8. And this I say, not that we may omit supplicating the saints, but to hinder our being careless, and entrusting our concerns to others only, while we fall back and slumber ourselves. For so when He said, “make to yourselves friends,29 he did not stop at this only, but He added, “of the unrighteous mammon;” that so again the good work may be thine own; for it is nothing else but almsgiving which He hath here signified. And, what is marvellous, neither doth He make a strict account with us, if we withdraw ourselves from injustice. For what He saith is like this: “Hast thou gained ill? spend well. Hast thou gathered by unrighteousness? scatter abroad in righteousness.” And yet, what manner of virtue is this, to give out of such gains? God, however, being full of love to man, condescends even to this and if we thus do, promises us many good things. But we are so past all feeling, as not to give even of our unjust gain, but while plundering without end, if we contribute the smallest part, we think we have fulfilled all. Hast thou not heard Paul saying, “He which soweth sparingly, shall reap also sparingly”?30 Wherefore then dost thou spare? What, is the act an outlay? is it an expense? Nay, it is gain and good merchandise. Where there is merchandise, there is also increase; where there is sowing, there is also reaping. But thou, if thou hadst to till a rich and deep soil, and capable of receiving much seed, wouldest both spend what thou hadst, and wouldest borrow of other men, accounting parsimony in such cases to be loss; but, when it is Heaven which thou art to cultivate, which is exposed to no variation of weather, and will surely repay thine outlay with abundant increase, thou art slow and backward, and considerest not that it is possible by sparing to lose, and by not sparing to gain.
9. Disperse therefore, that thou mayest not lose; keep not, that thou mayest keep; lay out, that thou mayest save; spend, that thou mayest gain. If thy treasures are to be hoarded, do not thou hoard them, for thou wilt surely cast them away; but entrust them to God, for thence no man makes spoil of them. Do not thou traffic, for thou knowest not at all how to gain; but lend unto Him who gives an interest greater than the principal. Lend, where is no envy, no accusation, nor evil design, nor fear. Lend unto Him who wants nothing, yet hath need for thy sake; who feeds all men, yet is an hungered, that thou mayest not suffer famine; who is poor, that thou mayest be rich. Lend there, where thy return cannot be death, but life instead of death. For this usury is the harbinger of a kingdom, that, of hell; the one coming of covetousness, the other of self-denial; the one of cruelty, the other of humanity. What excuse then will be ours, when having the power to receive more, and that with security, and in due season, and in great freedom, without either reproaches, or fears, or dangers, we let go these gains, and follow after that other sort, base and vile as they are, insecure and perishable, and greatly aggravating the furnace for us? For nothing, nothing is baser than the usury of this world, nothing more cruel. Why, other persons’ calamities are such a man’s traffic; he makes himself gain of the distress of another, and demands wages for kindness, as though he were afraid to seem merciful, and under the cloak of kindness he digs the pitfall deeper, by the act of help galling a man’s poverty, and in the act of stretching out the hand thrusting him down, and when receiving him as in harbor, involving him in shipwreck, as on a rock, or shoal, or reef.
“But what dost thou require?” saith one; “that I should give another for his use that money which I have got together, and which is to me useful, and demand no recompense?” Far from it: I say not this: yea, I earnestly desire that thou shouldest have a recompense; not however a mean nor small one, but far greater; for in return for gold, I would that thou shouldest receive Heaven for usury. Why then shut thyself up in poverty, crawling about the earth, and demanding little for great? Nay, this is the part of one who knows not how to be rich. For when God in return for a little money is promising thee the good things that are in Heaven, and thou sayest, “Give me not Heaven, but instead of Heaven the gold that perisheth,” this is for one who wishes to continue in poverty. Even as he surely who desires wealth and abundance will choose things abiding rather than things perishing; the inexhaustible, rather than such as waste away; much rather than little, the incorruptible rather than the corruptible. For so the other sort too will follow. For as he who seeks earth before Heaven, will surely lose earth also, so he that prefers Heaven to earth, shall enjoy both in great excellency. And that this may be the case with us, let us despise all things here, land choose the good things to come. For thus shall we obtain both the one and the other, by the grace and love towards man of our Lord Jesus Christ; to whom be glory and might for ever and ever. Amen.
1 [th`” sunavxew”, the technical term for a religious service among Christians. It does not of itself imply a Eucharistic service, as the above rendering seems to suggest. Indeed, the exordium of this Homily points directly to a service in which the sermon was prominent, making no allusion to the Lord’s Supper. For a wider use, see the close of Homily LXXXVIII.—R.]
2 Comp. Herbert’s Country Parson, c. 10. “He himself, or his wife, takes account of sermons, and how every one profits, comparing this year with the last.”
3 [“ Let us therefore remember again what was lately said, and thus go on to what is set before us today.”—R.] 4 Ep 2,14.
5 [The view here indicated, that this citation was part of the angelic message, is not generally held (but see J. A. Alexander in loco). It seems to me inconsistent with the last clause of verse 23: “which is, being interpreted,” etc.—R.] 6 [ “Unless,” is not found in the Mss., but inserted by the editors as necessary to the sense.—R.] 7 [ “Prophet” is the correct rendering; the plural in the Oxford version is probably due to a typographical error.—R.] 8 Is 8,3. [Chrysostom does not use the Hebrew name here, but simply repeats a part of the Greek phrase used to translate Maher-shalal-hash-baz in the LXX., which he had already given in the previous sentence: Tacevw” skuvleuson, ojxevw” pronovmeuson. The R. V). in loco does not accept the imperative rendering, but gives this marginal explanation: “That is, The spoil speedeth, the prey hasteth.”—R.] 9 Is 1,26-27.
10 [Supplied by translator literally, “it speaks.”—R.] 11 i. e., Aquila who flourished A. D. 128, Theodotion, A.D. 175, Symmachus, A.D. 201: who were all of them Jews or Judaizing heretics. Cave, Hist. Lit. 1,32, 48, 64).
12 [This reference to the “agreement” of the LXX. seems to indicate an acceptance of the current tradition in regard to the supernatural exactness of that version.—R.] 13 Ps 148,12.
14 Dt 22,17. In our translation, “the betrothed damsel cried.” This place is cited by St. Jerome on Mt with reference to the same argument).
15 Is 7,14.
16 [There is no indication here of any knowledge of the reading found in the oldest authorities of every class (uncials, cursives and versions): e[teken uiJovn, instead of e[teken to;n miJov to`n prwtovtokon . The latter is the reading of all authorities in Lc 2,7.—R.] 17 Gn 8,7).
18 Ps 90,2.
19 Ps 72,7.
20 Jn 19,27.
21 Jn 7,5). [In regard to the “brethren of our Lord,” there seems to be some confusion in the statements of Chrysostom : Comp. Hom. LXXXVIII., on chap. 27,55, 56. The digression here to the character of James seems intended to divert from the historical discussion.—R.] 22 Ac 15,4 Ac 16,4 Ac 21,18.
23 See Hegesippus in St. Jerome de Viris Illustr., c. 2).
24 Ac 21,20; see also verse 22).
25 [ajndeivan, “manliness.”—R.] 26 ejpeikei`”).
27 [ Ps 49,7). [This is the rendering of the LXX.—R.] 28 ka]n h\/, “even if it were.”—R.] 29 Jr 11,14.
30 Jr 15,1.
 “Jesus” was a name know among the People of Israel and sometimes it was imposed to a son. In this case, however, it is the Son who- according with the divine promise- will fulfill the meaning of the name: Jesus- Yehossua that means God saves.
 Origen, “Homilies on Psalms”,74
 Saint Matthew uses the translation of the LXX that utilize parthenos (virgin) to indicate the Jewish term ‘alma that means young woman