Values Without Virtues

Children Need to Be Taught Virtues, Not Values Based on Subjective Feelings

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share this Entry

A friend of mine, in preparing his charges for Confirmation, was astonished when one young man in his class confessed that he saw nothing wrong with the values espoused by Adolph Hitler. “He was merely carrying out his dream”, said the soon-to-be confirmed youngster. Dreams may be beautiful, but they fall far short of that ideal when one man’s dream crushes the dreams of countless millions of other people.

This private view of morality is not altogether surprising after so many years of indoctrinating grade school students with an approach to ethics called “Values Clarification”. The aim of Values Clarification is to get students to look into themselves to discover what they value. The cardinal sin in the contemporary world of education is to impose values on students. In their freedom, students are encouraged to get in touch with their feelings and find their own values.

A Massachusetts teacher, an ardent proponent of values clarification, came face-to-face with the limitations of her method when she discovered that her sixth grade students valued cheating and wanted to be free to cheat on their tests. The students were simply being practical. Philosophy and ethics were furthest from their minds. Despite her commitment to values clarification, the teacher insisted that she would not abide cheating in her class: “I personally value honesty; although you may choose to be dishonest, I shall insist that we be honest in our tests here. In other areas of your life, you may have more freedom to be dishonest.”

A particular value, such as cheating, can hardly serve as a moral norm when it clashes with a more objective value, such as fairness. Children do get in touch with this more substantial and universal value when they notice that a playmate is cheating at cards or in sports. “Hey, you can’t do that, that’s not fair, it’s cheating,” they will clamor. On such occasions, children are being ethical and realistic. It is a sad commentary on values clarification that young students are asked to ignore their innate sense of morality and put practicality in its place. This is not education, but exploitation.

In the world of professional baseball, cheating—in the form of taking Performance Enhancing Drugs—is not tolerated, despite the fact that many players have found recourse to PEDs very practical. The penalties for transgressing the rule are severe and may include lifetime banishment from the sport. The commissioner of baseball is notimposing values. He is concerned with the good of the game, and cheating does not contribute to that good. He is being fair, promoting a virtue whose merits everyone can recognize. The distinction between “fair” and “foul” is written into the heart of the game.

Fairness, easily recognized by children, is an important step toward justice. If students are ever to become advocates for social justice, they must abandon whatever subjective values they may have that are barriers to the cultivation of this very real virtue. Cheating may be a “value”, but honesty is a “virtue”. Values are easy to come by and differ from person to person. Virtues, though they must be developed, provide the glue that holds society together. Virtues are necessary if the Golden Rule is to be put into practice. Values Clarification logically leads to social confusion. James Q. Wilson, author of The Moral Sense, and a most temperate writer, has rightly classified Values Clarification as “pedagogical idiocy”.

Values without virtue is as unproductive as arithmetic without calculation or chatter without meaning. It is the shadow without the substance. Children should be taught virtue, not by imposing anything alien on them, but by helping them to understand their own innate convictions about the goodness of fairness, kindness, generosity, and courage. Then, they will begin to understand that virtues have their root in human nature and are, therefore, good for everyone, not just for the private individual. Getting in touch with one’s nature is far more realistic and important than getting in touch with one’s feelings.

We applaud baseball for trying to make the game fair. We cannot have such a positive attitude toward Values Clarification for sowing the seeds of anarchy in which each player goes his own way at the expense of the common good.

Dr. Donald DeMarco is adjunct professor at Holy Apostles College & Seminary in Cromwell, CT, a Senior Fellow of Human Life International and a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life. This article has been published by kind permission of Human Life International’s Truth and Charity Forum.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share this Entry

Donald DeMarco

Support ZENIT

If you liked this article, support ZENIT now with a donation