The bishops of Northern Ireland are warning that an amendment up for vote Wednesday will “radically change” the nature of the right to life, making it contingent on the will of another person, since if the legislation is passed “some children with a terminal diagnosis would lose their right to life and medical care while others with the same diagnosis would continue to receive treatment and care based on the choice of their mother.”
The Catholic Bishops of Northern Ireland today released a statement on the proposed abortion amendment to the Northern Ireland Justice Bill. Here is the full text:
Tomorrow, members of the Northern Ireland Assembly will vote on an amendment to the Northern Ireland Justice Bill that would permit the direct and intentional killing of unborn children with life limiting conditions, up to the moment of birth. The proposed amendment extends the law on abortion and cannot be reconciled in any way with a commitment to the universal moral principle of the right to life upon which the very existence and well-being of society is founded. It involves members of the Assembly weighing the value of one life against another and radically altering the principles upon which society’s approach to the inherent dignity of persons with disability and terminal illness is based.
Related: Pope Francis’ address to sick children and their parents: “We can ask the Lord: ‘But Lord, why? Why do children suffer? Why this child?’ The Lord will not say words, but we feel His gaze upon us and this will give us strength.”
It is difficult for anyone other than a mother herself to fully understand what it is to receive the devastating news that the baby in her womb is very seriously ill, and may not have a normal life-span. Pregnancy is a hopeful time but that hope can be painfully dashed for parents when the child in the womb is diagnosed with a life-limiting condition. Parents in this situation have a right to accurate information about what such a diagnosis actually means. Such life-limiting conditions in pregnancy, including anencephaly, are sometimes inaccurately
Both medical professionals and legislators have a duty to acknowledge that an unborn child with a life-limiting condition, including anencephaly, continues in every clinical and moral sense to be alive and worthy of continuing life-supporting intervention and care until natural death. If the proposed amendment is passed, some children with a terminal diagnosis would lose their right to life and medical care while others with the same diagnosis would continue to receive treatment and care based on the choice of their mother. This radically changes the inherent nature of the right to life, making it contingent on the will of another person. This is the fundamental and radical moral shift that is involved in supporting the proposed amendment. Experience shows that once the fundamental principle of the inherent right to life has been conceded, pressure to widen the circumstances in which life can be lawfully taken inevitably follows.
Related: The case of one mother whose baby was “diagnosed to die” and a doctor who has promoted perinatal hospices
With all who believe in the inherent right to life of every person, irrespective of how long or short their life will be, we appeal to Members of the Assembly to defend the dignity, humanity and right to life of unborn children with life-limiting conditions and to ensure mothers facing such traumatic situations in pregnancy receive the best possible support and care that a life-affirming society can provide. We ask Members of Assembly, in the interests of a truly compassionate and caring society, in which the most vulnerable are protected equally and with the same dignity as others, to reject the proposed abortion amendment and to work instead for the right of parents to peri-natal hospice services to support them in caring for their terminally ill child until natural death.
It is a sign of the progress of our society that we have become more effective at caring with dignity for those with terminal illness as they journey towards natural death. It would be a sign of our human progress in compassion and care if government policy focused on providing similar hospice care to those with terminal illness in the womb. Abortion, the destruction of a human life, can never be considered a humane or dignified response to the needs of a terminally ill child in the womb.
Many parents of children born with life-limiting conditions, including anencephaly, speak of how important it was for them to have the possibility of holding and caring for their child for a few hours or even for a few minutes, until death naturally occurred. We suggest that everyone would listen to their stories on the website www.onedaymore.ie or w
With all who believe the future of humanity lies in a society based on respect for the inherent dignity of every person from conception to natural death, and on the development of a culture of life, care and compassion in the world, we encourage Catholics and others, even at this stage, to contact their politicians to express concern about the proposed amendment and to ask them uphold the equal right to life of a mother and her unborn child in all circumstances, as the greatest guarantee that both will receive the best available life-supporting care.