(ZENIT News / Roma, 11.07.2024).- As Americans voted on November 5, a stark divide emerged in ten states where ballots addressed either the protection of baby life or the enshrinement of abortion rights in state constitutions. The outcomes varied widely, highlighting the shifting yet polarized landscape of reproductive rights in the U.S. Anti-abortion measures gained ground in Florida, Nebraska, and South Dakota, while pro-choice amendments passed in states like Arizona, Missouri, and Colorado. In nearly every state, voter decisions came with significant legal, ethical, and financial implications.
In South Dakota, voters rejected Amendment G, which proposed abortion access up to birth when a physician deems it necessary for the mother’s health. This measure, which opponents called «radical,» was soundly defeated with close to 60% voting «no.» Pro-life advocates raised concerns that the amendment would override parental consent laws and force medical professionals to perform abortions regardless of conscience protections. Notably, South Dakota was one of the few states where pro-life groups outspent pro-choice activists, with organizations like Life Defense Fund doubling the resources of pro-abortion advocacy group Dakotans for Health.
«We are thankful to the people of South Dakota for standing up to protect mothers and children,” Life Defense Fund co-chairs Leslee Unruh and Jon Hansen said in a statement. The campaign to oppose Amendment G faced hostility, with reports of harassment and threats against pro-life volunteers from some amendment supporters. Yet, despite these challenges, pro-life advocates celebrated the outcome as a victory for parental rights and medical ethics.
Meanwhile, Nebraska became the first state to embed pro-life language directly into its constitution with the «Protect Women & Children» measure. Previously, Nebraska limited abortions after 12 weeks with exceptions for medical emergencies, sexual assault, and incest. The approved measure enshrines these protections constitutionally, aligning with current state law while emphasizing a stance against later-term abortion except under strict conditions.
In contrast, Arizona voters approved an amendment establishing a “fundamental right to abortion” in the state constitution, even in cases beyond fetal viability. Proponents framed the amendment as essential to safeguarding the health of pregnant individuals, citing both physical and mental well-being as grounds for late-term abortion when deemed necessary. Arizona’s pro-choice lobby outspent the pro-life faction by a staggering 26 to 1, underscoring the resources committed to ensuring the amendment’s passage.
Other states leaned similarly. In Colorado, a ballot measure repealed a previous restriction preventing Medicaid and state insurance funds from covering abortion costs. Montana and Missouri also passed constitutional amendments supporting abortion rights, with pro-choice advocates outspending pro-life opponents by as much as 86 to 1 and 103 to 1, respectively. Missouri’s amendment, titled the «Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative,» allows the legislature to regulate abortion post-viability while prohibiting restrictions if deemed necessary for the mother’s health.
New York joined in with an overwhelming 72.9% of votes in favor of expanding anti-discrimination protections within its «Equality Rights Amendment» to include abortion. Pro-choice supporters lauded the amendment as a protective measure against any future anti-abortion initiatives. Similarly, in Maryland, Question 1 passed, reinforcing an already strong pro-choice stance in the state, which has long permitted late-term abortion under health-related exceptions.
In Florida, however, pro-life advocates celebrated a key victory as voters fell short of the 60% supermajority required to pass Amendment 4, which would have legalized abortion up to birth when deemed essential to the mother’s health. Governor Ron DeSantis and other pro-life leaders, like Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America’s Kelsey Pritchard, noted that the pro-life message resonated despite mainstream media hostility. Allegations of fraudulent signature-gathering practices surrounding the pro-choice campaign added further tension to Florida’s contentious debate.
This year’s ballot measures reflect the deep divide in American public opinion and law regarding reproductive rights. Each amendment, pro-life or pro-choice, includes broad “health” clauses—stemming from the Supreme Court’s 1973 “Doe v. Bolton” ruling—that define maternal health in terms of physical, emotional, and psychological factors. These provisions leave significant discretion to medical professionals, making state-level restrictions on abortion less enforceable.
Despite the financial dominance of pro-choice campaigns in most states, the varied outcomes reveal complex public attitudes, suggesting that Americans’ views on reproductive rights
Thank you for reading our content. If you would like to receive ZENIT’s daily e-mail news, you can subscribe for free through this link.
