Australia has become the first country to outlaw social media access for anyone under sixteen Photo: Red Cenit

This is the first country to legally ban social media for children, and this is what studies say about it

The measure did not emerge in a vacuum. For years, Australian parents have voiced concern over the stark gap between their children’s physical maturity and the psychological intensity of online environments

Share this Entry

(ZENIT News / Rome, 12.06.2025).- As governments, scientists, and parents confront the growing unease surrounding childhood exposure to the digital world, two developments on opposite sides of the globe have sharpened the debate. Australia has become the first country to outlaw social media access for anyone under sixteen, and new research from the American Academy of Pediatrics warns that early smartphone ownership correlates with poorer health outcomes for adolescents. Taken together, they form an emerging picture of a world grappling with how to accompany young people in landscapes shaped by screens, algorithms, and relentless connectivity.

Australia’s sweeping ban, approved by the government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and taking full effect this December, is the most forceful political response so far to parental anxiety over online dangers. The law reflects a national sentiment that social platforms function less as spaces for recreation and more as engines of social pressure—places where intimidation, predatory behaviour, and the commodification of self-image have grown too pervasive to ignore.

The measure did not emerge in a vacuum. For years, Australian parents have voiced concern over the stark gap between their children’s physical maturity and the psychological intensity of online environments. The government has now answered with a prohibition that some hail as urgently overdue and others view as an overreach that risks penalising responsible families. Romain Fathi, a researcher at the Australian National University in Canberra, describes the law as a bold experiment whose full consequences—beneficial or otherwise—will only reveal themselves over time.

Meanwhile, evidence continues to pile up regarding the toll smartphones can take on adolescent wellbeing. A peer-reviewed study published on 1 December in Pediatrics, drawing on data from more than 10,000 children, found strong associations between early smartphone acquisition and sleep disruption, obesity, and depressive symptoms. The average participant was barely twelve years old; most had obtained a device at eleven.

The study’s authors warn that the effects are not simply the result of socioeconomic factors or uneven parenting styles. Even when those variables were controlled, thirteen-year-olds who had recently received their first smartphone reported poorer mental health and diminished sleep quality compared with their peers. Younger first-time users were particularly vulnerable: the earlier the introduction to constant connectivity, the sharper the risks.

Researchers at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who contributed to the report, attribute the project to growing unease in medical circles about the neurological and psychological impact of digital saturation on developing minds. Ran Barzilay, the study’s lead author, stresses that smartphones cannot be framed as universally harmful. Many teenagers rely on them for safe communication, academic support, and social belonging. But the device, he argues, has become a significant health factor—one that parents must evaluate with the same seriousness afforded to diet, exercise, and sleep routines.

Barzilay urges families to approach the question of smartphone ownership not with fear, but with clarity. Setting household rules, controlling nighttime use, adjusting content filters, and encouraging screen-free physical activity can dramatically alter outcomes. Total prohibition, he suggests, is neither realistic nor always necessary; thoughtful oversight, however, may be indispensable.

Lawmakers are also racing to respond. Across the United States, thirty states and the District of Columbia now restrict phone use in schools. Some require students to lock their devices in sealed pouches throughout the day; others allow limited access during meals or outdoor breaks. School administrators report that unmanaged phone use erodes attention spans and undermines academic performance—an assessment shared by more than half of public-school principals surveyed by the National Center for Education Statistics.

Yet restrictions remain deeply contested. Parents’ groups argue that phones serve as a lifeline in emergencies and a practical tool for coordinating complex family schedules. A major U.S. parents’ association reported last year that 78 percent of parents wanted their children reachable during school hours, a figure lawmakers have struggled to ignore. When policymakers attempt blanket bans, critics warn that they may be solving one problem while creating another: severing vital lines of communication.

Underlying these competing impulses is a psychological pattern that troubles experts. A meta-review of 117 studies by the American Psychological Association found that extended screen time can heighten emotional and behavioural difficulties in children—difficulties which, in turn, lead them to spend even more time on screens as a coping mechanism. The cycle, once established, becomes increasingly hard to break.

Faith communities have watched these developments with particular interest, reflecting long-standing concerns about human dignity, relational life, and the formation of conscience in a hyper-mediated culture. While religious institutions have historically championed technology’s potential for connection and education, they also recognise the fragility of childhood and the moral complexity of digital environments. The current debate—unfolding in legislatures, laboratories, schools, and kitchens—touches not only on public policy but also on the spiritual and social fabric that sustains families.

What remains clear is that societies are entering a pivotal moment. Australia’s ban may mark the beginning of a new regulatory era; the accumulating body of research signals that digital childhood must be navigated with far greater intentionality. Parents, educators, and policymakers now face a shared challenge: to protect the young without isolating them, to guide without suffocating, and to ensure that the tools meant to enrich human life do not quietly diminish it.

Thank you for reading our content. If you would like to receive ZENIT’s daily e-mail news, you can subscribe for free through this link.

 

Share this Entry

Jorge Enrique Mújica

Licenciado en filosofía por el Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum, de Roma, y “veterano” colaborador de medios impresos y digitales sobre argumentos religiosos y de comunicación. En la cuenta de Twitter: https://twitter.com/web_pastor, habla de Dios e internet y Church and media: evangelidigitalización."

Support ZENIT

If you liked this article, support ZENIT now with a donation