(ZENIT News / Canberra, 11.30.2024).- Australia has become the first country to prohibit social media access for children under 16, a move that has sparked debate over its implications for online surveillance and digital freedoms. The groundbreaking legislation, passed by the Senate on November 28 with a vote of 34 to 19, is officially aimed at safeguarding the mental health of young Australians. However, critics fear the new rules could pave the way for invasive monitoring reminiscent of authoritarian regimes.
The “Online Safety Amendment Bill 2024” imposes hefty penalties of up to AUD 50 million (USD 32 million) on social media companies that fail to verify the ages of their users. Yet, the bill remains vague about the methods platforms should use to enforce compliance, leaving room for potential misuse of sensitive data.
Biometric Verification Raises Alarms
Although the legislation bars platforms from collecting personal information like government-issued IDs for age verification, it does not preclude the use of biometric systems. This could include facial recognition scans to confirm user identity—a prospect that has drawn widespread criticism.
Elon Musk, on his platform X, labeled the bill a covert mechanism for mass internet control. Free speech advocate Michael Shellenberger compared it to a dystopian system akin to China’s digital ID infrastructure, describing the law as «a Trojan horse for totalitarian oversight.»
Supporters of the legislation argue that the biometric approach is secure and ensures robust privacy protections. The bill mandates that any data collected for verification purposes must be destroyed immediately after use. However, enforcement mechanisms remain unclear, with potential requirements for ongoing user monitoring, such as periodic facial scans, to prevent age-restricted users from bypassing controls.
Scope and Exemptions
The legislation’s imprecise wording also leaves its reach ambiguous. Social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and Snapchat are explicitly targeted, but YouTube, deemed more educational, is likely to be exempt. This distinction raises questions about consistency in the application of the law.
Communications Minister Michelle Rowland emphasized the need for such measures to protect children from harmful online content but acknowledged the bill’s hurried passage left details unresolved.
Digital Freedoms in the Crosshairs
Australia’s bold step comes amidst broader debates over internet governance. Earlier this year, the government shelved a controversial “Misinformation and Disinformation Bill” after facing bipartisan opposition. Critics of that proposal highlighted its potential to stifle free speech by granting authorities wide-ranging powers to decide what constitutes “false” information.
Uncharted Territory
With the Online Safety Amendment Bill set to take effect late next year, Australia is entering uncharted territory in balancing youth safety with privacy and freedom. As global eyes turn to the legislation’s rollout, its success—or failure—could influence similar efforts worldwide.
For now, the question remains: Can this pioneering law safeguard children without infringing on the rights and liberties of millions of users? The world is watching to find out.
Thank you for reading our content. If you would like to receive ZENIT’s daily e-mail news, you can subscribe for free through this link.
