Data underscores a marked rise in pediatric gender transition interventions.

Data underscores a marked rise in pediatric gender transition interventions. Photo: Psyalive

Gender ideology: Biden administration has spent $165 million on genital mutilation for children

From January 2018 to September 2023, 16 states collectively spent over $165 million on gender transition-related services, with $45 million allocated for minors aged 17 or younger. Illinois, Oregon, and Washington led the expenditures, collectively accounting for over $98 million, including services for children

Share this Entry

(ZENIT News / Washington, 12.05.2024).- In a trend revealing the significant financial and societal impact of evolving healthcare policies, the Biden-Harris administration has facilitated a dramatic increase in taxpayer-funded gender transition interventions. These include surgeries, hormone therapies, and puberty blockers—services increasingly accessible to both adults and minors. Recent data obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) sheds light on the costs and scope of these programs, as well as the contentious debates they spark nationwide.

Massive Spending on Gender Transition Services 

From January 2018 to September 2023, 16 states collectively spent over $165 million on gender transition-related services, with $45 million allocated for minors aged 17 or younger. Illinois, Oregon, and Washington led the expenditures, collectively accounting for over $98 million, including services for children. These services range from mental health counseling to life-altering surgeries, with procedures such as mastectomies and hormone treatments now increasingly covered by Medicaid and other state programs.

A Systematic Shift in Accessibility 

Under Democratic administrations, key policy changes have reshaped how healthcare systems approach gender transition services. The Obama-Biden administration’s reinterpretation of anti-discrimination policies in 2014 and 2016 marked the beginning of this shift. By redefining «sex discrimination» to include gender identity, insurers were mandated to cover gender-affirming care, from hormone therapy to surgical procedures.

The Biden-Harris administration further restored and expanded these measures, reversing Trump-era rollbacks and reinforcing mandates for insurers and healthcare providers to offer gender transition services. Critics, including Roger Severino, former director of the Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services, argue that these policies impose ideological compliance on medical professionals, often at odds with their clinical judgment.

Children at the Forefront of Debate

Data underscores a marked rise in pediatric gender transition interventions. Between 2016 and 2019, surgeries for children aged 12 to 18 tripled, according to a 2023 Journal of the American Medical Association study. Factors driving this surge include increased accessibility through Medicaid and the proliferation of specialists in gender-affirming care. Dr. Jason Rafferty, a leading voice in pediatric gender policy, attributes the growth to the removal of financial and logistical barriers, with more surgeons now available to perform these procedures.

However, the growing prevalence of such interventions has ignited fierce ethical debates. Advocacy groups like Do No Harm argue that current practices prioritize political agendas over evidence-based care, with profound and potentially irreversible impacts on minors.

Financial Transparency and Public Concern

Obtaining a comprehensive picture of taxpayer spending on these services remains challenging. While some states provided detailed data to DCNF, others declined outright or imposed prohibitive fees for access to public records. For instance, Rhode Island demanded over $3,000 for processing requests, raising questions about accountability and transparency in public healthcare expenditures.

A Polarizing Policy Landscape

The rapid expansion of gender transition services highlights the broader polarization surrounding gender identity and healthcare. Proponents argue these measures represent essential steps toward inclusivity and mental health support for transgender individuals. Detractors counter that such policies compel taxpayers to fund experimental procedures, particularly for minors, and erode medical professionals’ autonomy.

Thank you for reading our content. If you would like to receive ZENIT’s daily e-mail news, you can subscribe for free through this link.

 

Share this Entry

ZENIT Staff

Support ZENIT

If you liked this article, support ZENIT now with a donation