By Carl Anderson

NEW HAVEN, Connecticut, JULY 7, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Long before there was a "left wing," or a "right wing," there was the Gospel, and long after these political labels have faded into oblivion, the Gospel will remain. In light of this, it is incredibly important that we come to Pope Benedict XVI's encyclical, "Caritas in Veritate," as a document that should inform our outlook.

We might sum up the Pope's thinking on the economy this way: Each of us must answer Christ’s question, "Who do you say that I am?" If we, with Peter, answer "The Messiah," then that should direct the axis of our life. Our most important reality must be the truth of our relationships. In this way, we can understand how the law and prophets could be summed up in Christ's two commandments: That we love God totally, and love our neighbors as ourselves. Thus we are able to speak of "caritas in veritate."

Once we accept Christ and these two commandments, we can no longer ask Cain's question: "Am I my brother’s keeper?" Instead, we must realize that our exercise of freedom cannot take the form of simply amassing the most wealth that we can. Rather, all that we do in freedom must reflect that reality and all our actions must take into account the effects of those actions on others. We need look no further than the first two words of the "Our Father," which Pope Benedict XVI quotes at the end of this document to see the common human family to which we belong.

To this end, we should remember several important facts:

First, we should ask not how this encyclical validates our worldview, but rather, how our worldview should change in response to this document.

Commentators should avoid the temptation of trying to analyze the encyclical from their own perspectives or through a political lens. The Pope’s thesis makes clear that an ethical foundation must transcend politics, and as the document makes explicit, the technical solutions belong to policy makers.

Second, the world deserves a market economy with a conscience, as the events of the global economy have made clear in the past year. Pope Benedict XVI in a 1985 paper criticized Marxism for excluding both God and a proper human role and thus for being too "deterministic." He also warned that market economies too risked collapse if they too excluded or ignored the ethical component of individual decision-making. Certainly, recent events have borne out his conclusion, and thus this encyclical, and its call for a moral system, are all the more compelling.

Third, while the debate around the world focuses on the technical fixes to the economic crisis, Pope Benedict XVI is asking us to re-evaluate the very foundation of our system -- and to build on the bedrock of ethics rather than the sand of determinism.

Fourth, the pope has called us to an economic reality that must respect the life of every person -- even the smallest and most helpless. This is both notable and timely, as is the fact that he has highlighted the necessary role religion must play in the public square.

Fifth, this encyclical is both a Catholic document and a catholic document. For anyone to view it purely through a national lens would be as misguided as viewing it politically. Take for example the Pope's call for just "redistribution." I doubt anyone can point to a country that doesn’t redistribute the wealth of its citizens in some way. The Pope asks whether, regardless of country, this is justly done. Those of us who live in economically vibrant countries, with a standard of living far beyond what much of the world can imagine, must pause to reflect on this.  Certainly we have a responsibility to help our neighbor.  We can and we should do more.

But we are not the only ones. Is it just when a "president" of a country in a poor corner of the world retires with billions of dollars in a Swiss bank account, while his people live on a dollar a day? Is it just when a population starves while an oligarchy grows wealthy? Certainly all have a right to food, and to basic services.

A Christian must be a person for others. Indeed, not only Christians, but all people are called to live this way.

For too long, far too many people have behaved as if their only allegiance was to themselves. We have all seen the results of such behavior, and know that it is a poor model -- ethically and economically.

Now, people are looking for a moral compass, and they know that Pope Benedict XVI has one. But while a compass can point the way, it is up to us to follow it.

* * *

Carl Anderson is the supreme knight of the Knights of Columbus and a New York Times bestselling author.

Creeping Secularism

A response to: No More Support for PBS

In the late ’70s, when the Soviet Air Force shot down a KAL civilian airliner with 269 people on board, the South African Sunday Times was one of the few newspapers not to register unqualified outrage. Their leading article said the following (I quote from memory): Why were you shocked when the Soviets shot down a civil airliner? It was less than half their daily average, unless they wiped out a good-sized Afghani village on the same day.

Why are we shocked at the secular humanist attack on PBS religious programming in the U.S.? After all, they are even being «reasonable» by allowing existing programming to continue! But we should not be shocked; they have been encroaching and circumscribing for years. Over the centuries, they have tried martyring, buying, threatening, bribing and state take-overs, and none of these has led to lasting success. The current trend is marginalisation; driving religion and its signs out of the public arena, making religions invisible.

Ironically, this is so often done while ostensibly preserving the «rights» of «minority» religions, as in the U.K. not too long ago, when the state tried to proscribe public displays of Christianity at Christmas on these precise grounds. That Muslims publicly said that the Christian celebration of Christmas did not offend them made not the slightest difference. The old childhood tactic of covering one’s ears and screaming loudly to avoid hearing what the other person says, works as well at 60 years as at 6, it seems.

Secular humanism, more’s the pity, is being ALLOWED to triumph in the First World. In Africa, Asia and South America, religion is flourishing. Christians, for example, just would not tolerate this kind of circumscription. Why have Europe and North America allowed this to happen?

I fear that one of the problems with Catholicism is the number of creeping secularists within the Catholic Church. In days gone by, as Cardinal Pell of Sydney once remarked, they left the Church and fought their battle from without. Having learned the long-term ineffectiveness of this, they have since discovered that the better tactic is to remain and undermine from within.

It seems to me that the only way to deal with this creeping secularism is to go out and meet the foe. If we cower behind fortress walls, they will eventually break down those walls, aided by those within who support them. Bad-mannered though it may seem to those who do not like a show of religion in the public arena, we must learn again to become militant; not only to fight back secularist attacks on religion, but to launch our own initiatives. Winning converts for Jesus Christ is the most powerful weapon we have against the assaults of secularism. We need to rediscover the power of kerygma, proclamation of the Good News of Jesus Christ, risen from the dead.

The early Christians did not fear «dungeon, fire and sword.» Why have we become so fearful in this age? The attack has been subtle, but it is getting more vociferous. Unless we fight back against the encroachments of creeping secular humanism, there might soon be very little left to defend.

Pope Benedict has carried the battle right to them. That is why parliaments have been trying to censor him. He lacks no courage on these matters; we should be supporting him for all we are worth!

Rev. Fr Phillip Vietri C.O.